But the real fact is that sequences of kudurru symbols are not as rigid as presented in the article. This post examines the types of sequences
that do occur on real kudurru, based
on descriptions and illustrations of these stones (Seidl 1989). According to Rao et al, such a reanalysis of
the non-linguistic symbols on kudurru
should not alter the conclusions of their study because this data set served
only as a control (Rao et al 2010). Let
us see whether that is, in fact, the case.
Some symbols are quite rare, appearing only in a single
period. Such “singletons” include a
shrine, boat, plow, dagger, twig or branch, cat, equid (horse or donkey), horse
head, waterbird, woman with bird legs, scorpion-man, winged bull, cross, standard,
and a scene of divinities in procession.
Other symbols may occur in only a few periods or in several, their
frequency often peaking in one period while they appear only occasionally or
not at all during other periods.
A snake is very commonly depicted, for example, but its
position is not codified. There may be a
snake coiled on the top of the kudurru,
one crawling up one or the other side, or the body of the snake may underlie a
whole row of symbols, sometimes with the snake’s head rising up to stand among
the ther other symbols.
The second illustration is clearer, showing a disorderly
grouping of symbols that are not lined up in neat rows. Symbols include a six-pointed star (Venus),
the crescent moon, and the sun disk on the upper right. Beneath these are a lamp, turtle, and
scorpion. And below these there is a
ram-headed staff, a spade, a bird on a staff or perch, a seated dog, a possible
jackel over a crouching ram. A snake
holds its head up before the ram, the snake’s body lying beneath the ram and
partly below the dog. In front of the
snake is a bird with the lightning bolt above it as well as a lion-headed
staff. Note that several symbols from the
first example are not included in the second.
There is no standing hybrid, no anthropomorph, no double lion-headed
scepter, and no arrows or knives. Also
note that the sequence of astral symbols at the top differs, although the moon
is in the center in both cases.
The next example is from the fourth or Ur I period (1989:
39, fig. 8, no. 62). Like the first kudurru
shown here, it is characterized by rows or registers of symbols, though not all
are neatly linear. Above the first row
are the astral symbols, this time in the sequence moon, sun, star. A lamp appears to the right of them despite
the fact that this is not an astral symbol.
Beneath are the eagle- and lion-staffs, the seated dog, and a scorpion
that floats above the baseline. To the
right of this are probably an “omega” on a base with a bird above it, though
these are nearly worn away, making identification somewhat uncertain. The second row includes a bird on a perch, a
calf with the lightning bolt rising from its back, a snake dragon with a spade
rising from its back, and another dragon, very small this time, with a stylus
rising from it. The last hybrid is in
front of a large stepped pyramid. The
bottom row depicts the snake, whose body underlies the other symbols – this
serpent sporting horns. A goatfish with
a ram-staff rising from it lies over the snake and a winged lion-dragon strides
upon the serpent as well. It is
significant for our purposes to note that the snake is at the bottom rather
than the top and that the goat-fish does not immediately follow any horned
crowns (which are not present at all).
Ignoring the Old and Middle Babylonian-Assyrian periods for
the moment, we come to the ninth Neo-Babylonian-Assyrian period (1989: 56, fig.
19, no. 97). This example is broken into
several pieces, with some parts entirely missing. Only two astral symbols are visible, the star
to the left of the sun. The moon may
once have been further to the right but is gone now. What is most interesting is the appearance of
two very small stars to the left of the scorpion. These small orbs are probably part of an
original group of seven, representing the Pleiades (a rare symbol). Beneath these are an eagle-staff, a scepter,
a lion-staff, and two horned crowns on bases.
There may have been a stylus on a base to the right, now mostly broken
away.
The last example shown here comes from the tenth and last
period, the Late Babylonian / Achaemenid period (1989: 60, fig. 22, no.
103). The snake lies across the top of
this stone with the astral symbols beside its tail: moon, sun, star, and
Pleiades (all seven stars present this time).
The scorpion is next followed by the lamp and the bird. Beneath these are two horned snake-dragon
protomes before bases, the first bearing a spade, the second a stylus. The “omega” floats above the second hybrid’s
head. There follows the goat-fish –
protome only – before a base that holds the ram-staff, both symbols of Ea. After these hybrids there are lion- and
eagle-staffs and the two horned crowns on bases. The head of the snake on the top of the stone
hangs down onto one edge, over a lightning bolt. Beside this there is a scepter. There are also symbols on the back of this kudurru, including the seated dog, three
standards with ribbons hanging down, and three anthropomorphic figures. The first of these apparent human holds a bow
and is accompanied by a reclining snake-dragon with wings. The second holds her (?) hands out before her
and has no accompanying creature. The
third holds a ring and has a reclining lion at his (her?) feet.
Thus, it is clear that the number of symbols varies from kudurru to kudurru. Some are quite common, appearing on stones from the early to the late periods, while others appear at some point and then disappear. The particular symbols even vary when a single god is represented. For example, Ea may be included in the form of a turtle, a goat-fish, a ram-staff, or some combination of these – with or without a pedestal or base. Where the horned crowns appear, they stand side by side. But there seems to be no hard and fast rule about what stands next to them. It is sometimes a representation of Ea (1989: 50, fig. 16, no. 84 as the ram-staff on base; p. 47, fig.13, no. 79 as the turtle); sometimes the paired eagle- and lion-staffs (1989: 60, fig. 22, no. 103); and elsewhere something different (p. 46, fig. 12, no. 75 right beside the three astral symbols). The astral symbols tend to occur above the other symbols, but there is no fixed order within this set. The moon may be on the left (fig. 13, no. 79), in the middle (fig. 2, no. 9), or on the right (mostlikely fig. 19, no. 97). The eagle- and lion-headed staffs tend to occur together, but this is not an invariable rule either. On kudurru no. 97 (in Seidl’s list), we see eagle-staff, scepter, lion-staff; on no. 98 the sequence is lion-staff, eagle-staff, scepter.
If we describe these regularities in the same terms as are used for the Indus script, we might say that there are "prefixes" here (the astral symbols). But there seem to be no "terminals" since the end of the symbol groupings is less standardized than the beginning. There may be some "sign pairs" such as the eagle- and lion-staffs, but these symbols also occur alone. Some symbols may be doubled, especially the horned crowns, which recalls the doubling of certain Indus signs (such as the DOUBLE BLANKETS). We might even describe the appearance of symbols on pedestals or bases as a kind of "ligature" -- this type of variation sometimes appearing and sometimes not. Like signs in a true script, the kudurru symbols sometimes line up very neatly, as well, a feature that often impresses people as indicating writing. These symbols are quite definitely not signs in a form of writing, though, and the fact that they often appear in non-linear arrangements is not surprising in view of this. I do not think there is enough material here to repeat the statistical test that Rao et al used. And I lack the competence to do it in any case. But it is clear, at least, that kudurru symbols do not provide an example of rigidly sequencing of nonlinguistic elements.
A kudurru from the prehistoric period (Seidl 1989: 21, fig. 1, no. 5). Note the sun, moon, and star in the top row on left, the snake in row 4. |
In Science
magazine, R.P.N. Rao and colleagues published a study of the conditional
entropy in the Indus script (Rao et al 2009: 1165). That is, they examine the likelihood that a
given sign will be followed by any other given sign. They also compare the conditional entropy of
the Indus script with that of various linguistic and non-linguistic systems.
In this article, the authors state that symbols of deities
found on kudurru – or Mesopotamian
boundary stones – follow a rigid sequence that reflects the hierarchy of the
deities. In contrast, they say, Indus
signs exhibit some regularity of sequencing but also evince flexibility similar
to that of linguistic symbols. In part,
they conclude that this is evidence that the Indus script encodes a
language.
Their graphs show the Indus script to have a conditional
entropy similar to that of known languages (Sumerian, Old Tamil, Sanskrit, and
English). But a major criticism of the
study is that some of the non-linguistic data are inaccurate. Specifically, the authors did not actually
sample data on symbols of Mesopotamian gods from real boundary stones. Relying on the “fact” that kudurru symbols are rigidly sequenced,
they created an artificial data set reflecting this “fact” (based on a
statement from Black and Green 1992).
Another kudurru from the prehistoric period (Seidl 1989: 23, fig. 2, no. 9). Note star, moon, sun sequence at the top, the snake at the bottom. |
Seidl lists 110 specific kudurru,
providing either a drawing, a photo, or a description of the vast majority
(1989: 19-63). She examines 66 symbolic
representations (anthropomorphic and zoomorphic symbols, depictions of objects,
and scenes) through 10 time periods from the prehistoric to the Achaemenid
era. The symbols fall into various
categories: astral objects (sun, moon, stars, lightning), man-made objects,
plants, animals, objects bearing the head and sometimes the forelimbs of an
animal (objects with protomes), hybrid beings that are composites of various animals
or partly human, anthropomorphs, unidentifiable objects, and scenes.
Of the 66 representations, 21 occur in nearly periods. This core of very frequent symbols includes
the following: crescent moon (moon god Sin), sun disk (sun god Shamash), single
star (Venus as the goddess Ishtar), lightning fork (thunder god Adad, Marduk,
or Buriaš), spade (Marduk in another role or Šulpa’e), lamp (Nusku, god of fire
and light), pedestal or base (usually with another symbol on top), horned crowns
(high/sky gods Anu, Enlil, and sometimes Aššur), stylus (Nabu, the scribe god),
dog (Gula, goddess of healing), striding bird (Papsukkal, a messenger or vizier
among gods), snake (Nirah and/or Ištaran, formerly known as Sataran), scorpion
(the goddess Išhara in the Kassite period), turtle (Ea, the water god),
lion-headed staff (Nergal, god of war, or Meslamta’ea, whose function seems to be
guarding doors), staff with double lion heads (Nergal, same as the previous, or
else the obscure Šar-ur), eagle-headed staff (among the Kassites, Zababa, again
a war god, but Šar-gaz otherwise), ram-headed staff (Ea again), snake-dragon
(Marduk or Nabu), goat-fish (Ea yet again), and an item resembling the Greek
letter omega (Ω) (mother goddess).
A kudurru from the early historic period (Seidl 1989: 27, fig. 3, no. 26). Note there are no visible astral symbols and no snake here. |
There is a certain amount of regularity in the positions in
which the symbols occur. Astral symbols
generally appear at the top of a kudurru,
although this varies somewhat. On
several of the later kudurru, the astral symbols decorate the top edge, while
the same symbols appear over the other symbols elsewhere, on the same side of
the stone. Among these, the crescent
moon, sun disk, and star are the most frequent.
The lightning fork may occur with the other astral symbols but it may
also stand on a pedestal or base, lower down and among other symbols on
bases. The last of the astral symbols, a
grouping of seven small stars probably representing the Pleiades, only
characterizes a few kudurru of the
two latest periods. Seidl considers the
position of the astral symbols to be due to their character, not the rank of
the deities symbolized. That is, the sky
is above and the earth below, so astral symbols stand above items and beings
that are earth-bound.
A kudurru from the Mesilim period (Seidl 1989: 31, fig. 4, no. 40). Notice the snake coiled on top, with astral symbols by its head, the moon here combined with the star (?), the sun beneath. |
Man-made objects most often stand on bases, but this is not
a hard and fast rule. The lamp, for
example, often seems to float in mid-air over another symbol. During some early periods, objects seem to
rise out of the back of one of the hybrid animals. And at times a hybrid bears a pedestal on its
back, with an object perched on the pedestal.
One particularly frequent object, the horned crown – which
does not appear during the first, prehistoric period – is usually duplicated,
but in a few cases there are three of these side by side. As these crowns represent high gods, they
often occur immediately below the astral symbols, reflecting the divine
hierarchy. Immediately after the crowns
on their bases there is often a symbol for the water god, Ea. This may be a goat-fish (the ancestor of
Capricorn), a turtle, a ram-headed staff, or a combination of two of these
(sometimes including a pedestal, sometimes not). The “omega” sometimes appears among the
symbols of high-ranking gods, probably representing the mother goddess Nintu
(Black and Green) or Ninhursag/Ninmah (Seidl).
Generally speaking, the sequence of other symbols appears to be less
standardized.
A kudurru from the Ur I period (Seidl 1989: 39, fig. 8, no. 62). Note the moon, sun, and star at the top and snake at the bottom. |
To better demonstrate the variability, I present images of
several kudurru (my artwork based on
drawings or photos in Seidl 1989). The
first comes from the earliest period when kudurru were made, the prehistoric
period (1989: 21, fig. 1, no. 5). The
top row on one side bears the astral symbols (an apparent four-pointed star
representing the sun, the crescent moon in its typical lazy position, and a
five-pointed star for Venus). The second
row or register includes a reclining animal or hybrid, a seated dog, and a
bird. The third row has a hybrid, part
man and part animal, standing upright on the far left. Next to him seems to be the spade followed by
the stylus, though it is hard to be sure of these. The “U” shape with rumpled sides is a
lightning bolt. Next to it stands an
anthropomorphic figure, perhaps a deity.
The fourth row of symbols includes a standing animal (a jackal?), a
snake, a scorpion, and the lion-headed staff.
The bottom row bears a double lion-headed scepter, what seem to be two
arrows or knives, two birds – one stacked upon the other – and a cross. There are also a few symbols on an adjacent
side, over the text of the inscription.
These include an unidentified animal, a peculiar symbol that Seidl terms
a bundle, and a turtle, beneath which there are three birds, one on a staff.
A kudurru from the Ur III period (Seidl 1989: 47, fig. 13, no. 79). The moon, sun, and star are more or less beside the snake here. |
The next kudurru comes from the second period, the early
historic period (Seidl 1989: 27, fig. 3, no. 26). Here, there seem to be no astral symbols, but
much of the top of this stone has broken away.
So the sun and moon may once have adorned this kudurru as well. What is visible is a lightning bolt in the
center with a lamp to its right. Below,
there is a standing anthropomorph with one foot upon a winged snake-dragon (one
of the most common hybrids). There may
be a bundle on the lower right, partly broken away. Thus, many symbols appear to be missing, but
due to the condition of the stone, it is not clear which ones never were present and
which have been obliterated by time.
From the following Mesilim period comes the next example
(1989: 31, fig. 4, no. 40). The snake
that was so small in the first example (fourth row) and stretched beneath some
symbols on the second is here coiled on top with its head extending down among
the symbols. The text indicates that the
snake is wound around a cow or bull.
Next to the snake’s head are the astral symbols, the moon taking up the
lower part of a circle containing a seven-pointed star, with an eight-pointed
star below. To the left of these are two
horned crowns on pedestals, representing the high gods Anu and Enlil (or
Ellil). To the left of these is the
goatfish before a base with a ram protome on top, together symbolizing the god
Ea. To the left again is the “omega” on
a base, representing a goddess, perhaps Nintu or Ninhursag. Beside this is a hybrid being called snake
dragon before a base with a spade on it (Marduk) followed by another such
dragon before a base bearing a rectangle.
The next base has no creature associated with it and holds a triangular
object adorned with dotted circles.
There follow a winged lion dragon, a lion-headed staff, a bird looking
backward, an eagle-headed staff, and another winged lion-dragon, this one with
apparent horns. A second lion-headed
staff is partly covered by the head of the snake. Several symbols make their appearance here
that did not occur on the previous examples: the horned crowns, the goatfish,
and the “omega” are very common from this period forward.
Skipping the poorly attested fifth period, we move on to an
example from the sixth, the Ur III or Isin period (1989: 47, fig. 13, no.
79). Some kudurru from this period have
symbols neatly arranged in rows or registers, but this one does not. The snake’s head is on top, but the creature
is not coiled. Instead, its body
stretched up the side of the stone.
Beneath the snake’s head and part of its body are the three astral
symbols (moon, sun, star), with two horned crowns on bases beneath them. To the right of the crowns is a turtle over a
base, representing Ea who appeared as a goat-fish elsewhere. Further to the right is a scepter and a
bird. To the left of the horned crowns
is the lightning bolt, a bird on a perch, and an arrow (moving from right to
left). These are followed by a seated
dog and an “omega” without a base. There
are two horned snake-dragons – or rather the protomes of such dragons – next to
bases bearing the stylus and spade. A
double lion-headed scepter floats above the second hybrid, a scorpion above the
first.
A kudurru from the Neo-Babylonian-Assyrian period (Seidl 1989: 58, fig. 21, no. 100). The star, sun, and moon appear here on the top of the stone. There is no snake on this boundary stone. |
A more complete example from the ninth period has symbols on
the top edge and down one side (1989: 58, fig. 21, no. 100). The top bears the three astral symbols: star,
sun, moon. The lightning bolt is also
there, standing on a pedestal, as well as the seated dog. Down the side are a spade on a base, the
double lion-headed staff on a base, and a lion-staff on a base. The other side also has a single symbol, the
stylus on a base. Notice that the high
gods, Anu and Enlil, are missing completely as there are no horned crowns. Ea is also missing as there is neither a
goat-fish nor a turtle. And while the
lion-staff is present, its usual companion, the eagle-staff, is missing.
The side of the same kudurru as shown above (Seidl 1989: 58, fig. 21, no. 100). |
A kudurru from the Late Babylonian-Achaemenid period (Seidl 1989: fig. 22, no. 103). On the top of the stone are the astral symbols, moon, sun, and star, as well as the snake. |
Thus, it is clear that the number of symbols varies from kudurru to kudurru. Some are quite common, appearing on stones from the early to the late periods, while others appear at some point and then disappear. The particular symbols even vary when a single god is represented. For example, Ea may be included in the form of a turtle, a goat-fish, a ram-staff, or some combination of these – with or without a pedestal or base. Where the horned crowns appear, they stand side by side. But there seems to be no hard and fast rule about what stands next to them. It is sometimes a representation of Ea (1989: 50, fig. 16, no. 84 as the ram-staff on base; p. 47, fig.13, no. 79 as the turtle); sometimes the paired eagle- and lion-staffs (1989: 60, fig. 22, no. 103); and elsewhere something different (p. 46, fig. 12, no. 75 right beside the three astral symbols). The astral symbols tend to occur above the other symbols, but there is no fixed order within this set. The moon may be on the left (fig. 13, no. 79), in the middle (fig. 2, no. 9), or on the right (mostlikely fig. 19, no. 97). The eagle- and lion-headed staffs tend to occur together, but this is not an invariable rule either. On kudurru no. 97 (in Seidl’s list), we see eagle-staff, scepter, lion-staff; on no. 98 the sequence is lion-staff, eagle-staff, scepter.
If we describe these regularities in the same terms as are used for the Indus script, we might say that there are "prefixes" here (the astral symbols). But there seem to be no "terminals" since the end of the symbol groupings is less standardized than the beginning. There may be some "sign pairs" such as the eagle- and lion-staffs, but these symbols also occur alone. Some symbols may be doubled, especially the horned crowns, which recalls the doubling of certain Indus signs (such as the DOUBLE BLANKETS). We might even describe the appearance of symbols on pedestals or bases as a kind of "ligature" -- this type of variation sometimes appearing and sometimes not. Like signs in a true script, the kudurru symbols sometimes line up very neatly, as well, a feature that often impresses people as indicating writing. These symbols are quite definitely not signs in a form of writing, though, and the fact that they often appear in non-linear arrangements is not surprising in view of this. I do not think there is enough material here to repeat the statistical test that Rao et al used. And I lack the competence to do it in any case. But it is clear, at least, that kudurru symbols do not provide an example of rigidly sequencing of nonlinguistic elements.
REFERENCES
Black, J. and A. Green. 1992. Gods, Demons and Symbols of Ancient Mesopotamia: An Illustrated
Dictionary. Austin: University of Texas.
Rao, R.P.N., N. Yadav, M.N. Vahia, H. Joglekar, R. Adhikari,
I. Mahadevan. 2009. “Entropic Evidence for Linguistic Structure in the Indus
Script,” in Science (324) 5931: 1165
(doi: 10.1126/science.1170391).
_____. 2010. “Probabilistic analysis of an ancient
undeciphered script” in IEEE Computer online at http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/rao/ieeeIndus.pdf
and http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/rao/IndusResponse.html
Seidl, U. 1989. Die Babylonischen Kudurru-Reliefs: Symbols Mesopotamischer Gottheiten.
Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Freiburg Schweiz, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
(reprint, orig. 1969).
Wandering through the web looking for help, I stumbled upon your page, which I find very interesting and expert, so maybe you can and want to help me with a translation that I have ventured, not with much conviction. Could you take a look?, Is at the bottom, in this page: http://txyz.wordpress.com/2012/04/05/sumerians/
ReplyDelete. It is about the statuette of Lugaldala ....
Good. It is useful for my understanding
ReplyDelete